HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1984
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 01:02
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 79.5
39% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 116
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
HP(103C 1984) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 3.97
4% 5.12 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 7.39
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 329 329 37 7 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 391
Write 327
Mixed 312
SusWrite 177
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 21.4
100% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 34.3
62% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Ramaxel RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 15
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback