MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 05:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 702
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1395 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 71.2
1% 43.2 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 49.2
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aitc ST100 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 23 32 17 36 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 470
Write 380
Mixed 309
SusWrite 49.6
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 20.6
113% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 28.1
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
43GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 74.2
Write 75.8
Mixed 57
SusWrite 87.4
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AID48G26C19UBD Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 30.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback