Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 159% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 201% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 02:15
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 86.2 1-Core 156 2-Core 312 100% 185 Pts	4-Core 624 8-Core 1,252 110% 938 Pts	64-Core 3,124 193% 3,124 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	156% Outstanding	Lighting 215 Reflection 227 Parallax 232 176% 225 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 208 Splatting 141 158% 201 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 140 107 155 159 228 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 459 Write 380 Mixed 320 SusWrite 160 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 17.2 80% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 35.2 46% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 707GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2667 2221 1493 1518 1521 1521 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	386% Outstanding	Read 2,713 Write 2,651 Mixed 2,058 SusWrite 1,824 519% 2,311 MB/s	4K Read 69.7 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 99.5 334% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,480 DQ Write 1321 DQ Mixed 1,398 1,049% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 386% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 48.7 MC Write 46 MC Mixed 43.7 132% 46.1 GB/s	SC Read 29.2 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 40.4 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,289x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,428x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,247x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,015

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16