Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGbt___ AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 8I848P775-G
Memory1.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 17:38
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 27.3
26% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 29.4
8-Core 31.3
4% 30.3 Pts
64-Core 33.7
2% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y120L0 123GB-$132
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 15
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 14.7
11% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 31%
Ext Hard Disk 320GB
136GB free, PID 021b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 9.5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 10.1
14% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 3 slots used
1GB DIMM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
9.05% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback