Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1750 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 13:22
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 102
49% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 245
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.1% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 70.5
62% 74.6 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 72
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 5.7 6.5 9.8 9.4 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 906
Write 2.5
SusWrite 7.2
63% 305 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
37% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 57%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
368GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 72 73 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.1
Write 74.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 72.7
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JM1333KLN-4G Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback