MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7737
MotherboardMSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 10:04
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 174
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 668
58% 496 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 195
Parallax 175
124% 174 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 219
Splatting 147
164% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 130%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 315 316 307 306 306 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 315
Write 327
Mixed 298
SusWrite 310
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 102
123% 220 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 74%
Great: 230%
Adaptec Array 12TB
401GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 396 382 393 403 399 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 115%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
152GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 209 206 206 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 219
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 207
137% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
303% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 138%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 160
Write 117
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 114
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 211 208 207 214 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 146
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 211
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.7
356% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 100%
Great: 137%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 173 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 116
Write 125
Mixed 77
SusWrite 177
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.6
322% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
549GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 132 133 130 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 132
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.6
327% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 41.4
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) - $305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback