MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7737
MotherboardMSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 156
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 683
60% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,248
77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4064 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 200
Parallax 191
127% 182 fps
MRender 295
Gravity 239
Splatting 147
177% 227 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 136%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 314 314 309 307 308 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 301
Write 322
Mixed 290
SusWrite 310
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 21.1
75% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 94.2
119% 217 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 230%
Adaptec Array 12TB
401GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 414 397 400 406 409 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 115%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
152GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 208 209 205 206 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 231
Mixed 106
SusWrite 207
139% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
314% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 138%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 119 116 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 164
Write 112
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 117
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 211 210 207 213 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 146
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 211
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.7
362% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 137%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 173 177 178 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 177
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
310% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86%
Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
549GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 125 123 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 125
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.5
317% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 41.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) - $305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback