Acer Veriton S6630G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton S6630G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S6630G
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 02:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 212
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 386
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 078A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 93 92 97 79 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 389
Write 329
Mixed 192
SusWrite 106
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 11.8
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 55.8
DQ Mixed 36.5
26% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
291GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 124 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 126
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton S6630G Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton S6630G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback