Biostar IH61MF-Q5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar IH61MF-Q5  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 211
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 8.66
6% 8.08 fps
MRender 9.71
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.64 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Supersspeed S540 30GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 55 54 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 214
Write 54.8
Mixed 80
SusWrite 54.3
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 7.8
57% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 8.8
14% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA MK3275GSX 320GB
234GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.4 3.5 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 31
Write 5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 4.6
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IH61MF-Q5 Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar IH61MF-Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback