TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 07:26
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$131
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 163
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 470
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 70%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.99%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 7L250S0 250GB-$91
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 48 33 50 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 50
Write 60.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 43.6
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
223% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 27.4%
 Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
218GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 102
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 58.9%
 Great: 68%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
2GB free, PID c72a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 0.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 5.2
7% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.79%
 Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 48.5%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples230x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples90x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples86x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples54x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples32x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples25x
RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback