Asus X540UPR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X540UPR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540UPR
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 428
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8500M
Asus(1043 1CE0) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.2001.9003
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 5.97
4% 5.72 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 5.65
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint 128GB 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 317 118 241 321 322 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
Read 356
Write 268
Mixed 180
SusWrite 273
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 9.4
112% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 66
95% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 06C1 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.6% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 20.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540UPR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540UPR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback