Asus X540UPR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X540UPR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540UPR
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 08:57
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 521
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8500M
Asus(1043 1CE0) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.2001.9003
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 5.97
4% 5.69 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 5.74
4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint 128GB 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 296 303 311 312 304 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
Read 371
Write 304
Mixed 190
SusWrite 301
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 9.5
86% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 63.3
99% 184 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 06C1 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540UPR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540UPR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback