HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 180
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 516
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 129
Parallax 129
85% 121 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 124 141 143 145 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 344
Write 366
Mixed 267
SusWrite 139
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 36.1
120% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 41.5
39% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 117%
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB
24GB free
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 130 143 141 145 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 286
Write 306
Mixed 193
SusWrite 141
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 29.4
97% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 34.5
28% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GB
129GB free
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 129 146 144 146 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 238
Write 223
Mixed 184
SusWrite 142
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 29.4
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 34.8
32% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 100%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
137GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 130 143 141 144 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 211
Write 226
Mixed 206
SusWrite 141
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 29.3
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 36.7
33% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 99%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
110GB free, PID 0820
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 24.2
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR4C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback