HP h9-1260ez

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h9-1260ez  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 461
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 68
Parallax 89.7
59% 76.6 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 58
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 128 140 131 120 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 416
Write 184
Mixed 218
SusWrite 130
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 17.9
98% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 56.2
61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 70%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.4
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 18
6% 26 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 8.7
29% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 83%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108
620GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 16 31 23 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
671GB free
Firmware: MS2OA5R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 122 132 123 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 108
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 123
68% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 99%
WD Elements 10B8 2TB
346GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 15.9
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback