Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 15:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 142
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 421
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Zotac(19DA 5511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 127
Parallax 146
100% 132 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 116
Splatting 102
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 116 66 53 52 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 396
Mixed 324
SusWrite 93.9
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 36.2
129% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 108
87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32
52GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 56.2
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 53.8
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
497GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 71.9
Write 68.9
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 85.3
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 140 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 85.1
Write 111
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 139
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback