Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3240-$51 10,752 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 90.3 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 171 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Biostar(1565 1110) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 3.38 2% 3.01 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 404 Write 140 Mixed 290 61% 278 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 28.5 124% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 177 153% 224 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1x4GB 3,903 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 7.8 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	95x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	38x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	32x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 45%, 73 samples	41x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 41%, 60 samples	36x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $43

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16