Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 10:35
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 196
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 701
63% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 44.6
32% 42.3 fps
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 30.4
28% 32.5 fps
Poor: 28% Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 58 62 71 64 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 396
Write 79.2
Mixed 108
SusWrite 66.4
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 13.8
51% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 48.5
53% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 76%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$80
558GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 111 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
292GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 59
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 54.8
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
395GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 103 105 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67% Good
Read 131
Write 80.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 102
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST4000NM0245-1Z2107 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SS05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 180
Write 184
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 89.4
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 125%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 82.6
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST4000NM0245-1Z2107 4TB
198GB free
Firmware: SS05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 82.8
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
207% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 125%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$80
927GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66% Good
Read 141
Write 128
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 88.4
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 23
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback