HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 78 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 353 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Lighting 56.5 Reflection 53.7 Parallax 50 46% 53.4 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 49 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 26 44 18 65 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 308 Write 64.2 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 34.3 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 4.4 42% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 21.1 17% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 401GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 119 122 121 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 117 Write 118 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 120 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB 8,040 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 52GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.8 11 10 9.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 9.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 10.1 20% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 135% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown S939A2UGS-ITR 8502 PSD38G16002 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.1% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,050x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	974x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	403x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	383x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	339x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369