HP p6638d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6638d  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 295
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21.1
18% 20.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 18.2
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/350G 360GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 190 222 227 224 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 230
Write 145
Mixed 198
SusWrite 201
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 13.8
66% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 139
120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CF8 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 9801 99U5458-002.A00LF 8GB
1066, 1333, 1066, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 14.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6638d Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6638d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback