Asrock H170M-ITX/DL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H170M-ITX/DL  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161026
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 01:52
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 492
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 110
Parallax 126
96% 118 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 105
Splatting 92.4
95% 120 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/480G 480GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 348 354 379 377 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 356
Write 304
Mixed 176
SusWrite 360
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 11.3
80% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 66.8
93% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
105GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 313 314 314 314 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 452
Mixed 418
SusWrite 328
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 51.4
167% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
398GB free
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 395 384 411 412 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 394
Mixed 355
SusWrite 399
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 41.1
136% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 111
151% 275 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 126%
ST2000DM001-1ER164 240GB
101GB free
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 140 136 140 137 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 431
Write 326
Mixed 205
SusWrite 132
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 17
71% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
43% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 92.8
123% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 53%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
381GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 102 97 105 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 49.1
Write 77.5
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 103
112% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 52%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.5
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 41.8
53% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-ITX/DL Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H170M-ITX/DL - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback