Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 11:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 688
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 91 73 9.5 44 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 413
Write 409
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 59.3
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 7.7
56% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 87.2
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 18.9
22% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
93GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 116 116 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 163
Write 150
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 113
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GIS Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
3133, 3133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 34.5
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback