Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180724
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	47%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 44 2-Core 94 47% 72.3 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 204 21% 170 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5655 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.6% Average	Lighting 61.8 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 49.4 50% 58 fps	MRender 59.9 Gravity 45.5 Splatting 59.6 45% 55 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 166 127 107 106 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 516 Write 385 Mixed 485 SusWrite 144 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 36.5 123% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 406 DQ Mixed 294 246% 353 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 115%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 228GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 72 72 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 42.5 Write 99 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 71.9 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 20,956 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 23.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	733x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	636x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16