| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX504GM |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180724 |
| Uptime | 3.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 29 '20 at 10:56 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
89.2%
Excellent
|
87% 154 Pts
|
72% 578 Pts
|
43% 688 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
|
52.9%
Above average
|
55% 60.9 fps
|
49% 59.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
76.3%
Very good
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
63% 63.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 733x |
| Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples | 481x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 636x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 577x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |