Lenovo 20AR006TLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20AR006TLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AR006TLM
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140903
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 17:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Memory 15.2
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 122
35% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 91.5
10% 81.6 Pts
64-Core 59.7
4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.44
3% 3.92 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP320 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 101 53 49 41 57 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 275
Write 92.2
Mixed 206
SusWrite 95.9
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 2.4
27% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 35.6
52% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 10
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 358
11% 358 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback