Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 14:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 313
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,205
107% 908 Pts
64-Core 1,204
74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 95%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB
943GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1060 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 1411 1412 1413 1415 1411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 1,816
Write 1,679
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 1,414
356% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 64.2
255% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 1,498
DQ Mixed 988
872% 1,300 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 301%
Great: 312%
Lexar uSD UHS2 RDR 64GB
34GB free, PID b055
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 131
Write 43.6
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 56
72% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
162% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF4G72AZ-3G2BZ 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 39.3
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 32
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback