Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409BA
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 13:08
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 61.9
36% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 59.6
8-Core 58.5
8% 59 Pts
64-Core 78.3
5% 78.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1C11) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20.36.11
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ3 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 152 136 135 140 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 462
Write 458
Mixed 442
SusWrite 180
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 27.8
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 170
129% 174 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback