Acer Extensa 2510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Extensa 2510  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA50_HB
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 13:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 97.1
51% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0866) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.81
3% 4.97 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.91
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 183 280 302 306 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 424
Write 303
Mixed 97
SusWrite 258
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 8.7
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 14
12% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1777, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 15.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2510 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback