Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 14:46
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 189
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 66.9
56% 68.6 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 70
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 427 428 429 425 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,210
Write 2,125
Mixed 1,456
SusWrite 434
347% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 68.5
226% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 619
452% 594 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 211%
Great: 264%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
486GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 153 153 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 134
Mixed 84
SusWrite 152
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 183 184 183 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 142
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 181
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
268GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 178
Write 155
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 118
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 33.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback