Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 20:11
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 181
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 326
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2010 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 54.8
44% 55.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 60.6
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 572 429 430 425 424 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 448
328% 1,468 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 64.5
209% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 582
433% 580 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 202%
Great: 264%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
486GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 154 153 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 141
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 153
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 185 187 186 185 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 150
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 185
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
268GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 118 118 121 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 173
Write 151
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 118
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 114%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
255GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 36.2
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 36.2
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 39.6
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 30.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback