Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Motherboard H77ITX-C-E (all builds)
Motherboard	ZOTAC H77ITX-C-E
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 11:17
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 27 1-Core 5.3 2-Core 10.1 11% 14.1 Pts	4-Core 15.3 8-Core 27.5 3% 21.4 Pts	64-Core 32.5 2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 1186) 512MB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 2.06 2% 2.78 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 2.43 2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000BUCT-63PUZY0 500GB 655 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 30 42 39 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 56.7 Write 51.9 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 36.3 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5.7 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.4 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 273 15% 273 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16