Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD5H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '17 at 07:49
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 649
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 156
Parallax 137
144% 156 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 141
Splatting 115
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 123%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
221GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 409
Mixed 419
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 49.9
179% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 126
104% 155 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 415
Mixed 417
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 45.1
175% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 115
139% 245 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 92.8
Mixed 68.7
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 7.03
4K Mixed 0.61
243% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
928GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 169
Write 129
Mixed 152
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.22
73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
797GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 135
Mixed 124
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.23
98% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
615GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 128
Write 115
Mixed 107
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0215 CMY8GX3M2A2400C11 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0215 CMY8GX3M2A2400C11 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback