Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 06:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 743
70% 580 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 61.8
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 67.9
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 869
Write 582
Mixed 604
152% 685 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 44.8
154% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 332
276% 386 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
iBIGStor USB Hard Drive 1TB
187GB free, PID 0101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 40.9
53% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 24.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback