Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CF0TC
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 128
54% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 357
35% 287 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 18
Parallax 6.66
3% 9.48 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fuhler C2004 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 293 78 76 88 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 444
Write 366
Mixed 353
SusWrite 133
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 16.1
82% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 1.2
55% 128 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
787GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 140 141 142 138 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 59
SusWrite 138
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback