Today's hottest deals

Lenovo Lenovo C225

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo Lenovo C225  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua CRB
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 33.6
25% 34 Pts
4-Core 33.7
8-Core 34.1
4% 33.9 Pts
64-Core 34.1
2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Legend(17AA 3629) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 9.2.0.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.26 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 117 108 122 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 116
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F1333 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Lenovo C225 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Lenovo C225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback