Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2778-C1
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111219
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 09:22
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5680 4,201 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 174 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 531 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 633 39% 633 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2307 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Lighting 80.1 Reflection 80.6 Parallax 72.1 65% 77.6 fps	MRender 78.9 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 75.6 62% 75.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 21 104 76 21 127 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.9% Below average	Read 228 Write 97.7 Mixed 114 SusWrite 70.8 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 14.7 56% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 49.1 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 41.6 34% 47 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 85%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 115GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 135 64 72 54 66 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.9% Below average	Read 250 Write 238 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 105 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 20.7 58% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 468GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 28 30 29 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 29.3 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M470-2 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

CPU
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	22x
Xeon W3530Intel $287Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x

SSD
600 480GBSeagate $199Bench 84%, 1,254 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	29x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	25x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16