Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-60 291 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 28.8 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 49 21% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 47.6 8-Core 19 5% 33.3 Pts	64-Core 26 2% 26 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9100M G 317 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 014D) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 80 168 155 155 142 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 176 Write 147 Mixed 148 SusWrite 136 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 14 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 97 DQ Write 75.7 DQ Mixed 77.2 60% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 102%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91 6,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 297GB free Firmware: GJ003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 68 91 84 85 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 87 Write 79 Mixed 24 SusWrite 80.8 49% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.8% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.7 6% 1.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16