Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '17 at 11:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 181
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 272
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3062) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.12
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 9.13
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 499
Write 403
Mixed 444
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 5.02
102% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 31.6
86% 179 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 96
Write 111
Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.33
100% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback