ADD TO PC
BUILD

Viewsonic VOT132

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Viewsonic VOT132 (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '17 at 04:40
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 330 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 7.1 2-Core 14 19% 23.3 Pts	4-Core 23 8-Core 23.1 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 23.1 1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(105B 0D52) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.98 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS128GG4BAAA-NonFDE 128GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGLA0203 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6352 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3771 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 906366419376 (AA) Unknown 100 100 94498455650 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4306698292 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 111 (C2) HDA temperature 49 37 270584184883 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	27.5% Poor	Read 195 Write 122 Mixed 190 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 6.03 38% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 36.6 DQ Mixed 11.1 12% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BW9J2SG4FNH 1x2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.96% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 10%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback