Lenovo 20HJS24M00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HJS24M00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS24M00
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime21.5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 12:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 564
62% 489 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4332
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 17
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.4
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L7QCXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 623 616 624 627 605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,590
Write 1,363
Mixed 740
SusWrite 648
242% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 72.9
249% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 903
685% 923 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 222%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HJS24M00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HJS24M00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback