Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E5V-K04MA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 12:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 54.1
25% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 53.2
8-Core 39.2
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.72
1% 0.82 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.BH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 19 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 43
Write 40.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 23.9
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback