Intel S2600CW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel S2600CW  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 10:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 696
63% 531 Pts
64-Core 3,550
220% 3,550 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 58.3
36% 44 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 36.7
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KI256G8 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 251 250 251 252 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 408
Write 396
Mixed 384
SusWrite 257
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 33.9
107% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 198
180% 272 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 115
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 56GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.5% Good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CW Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Intel S2600CW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback