Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 02:59
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 946
92% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 63.1
41% 54.4 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 67.1
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
19GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 407
Write 436
Mixed 294
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 43
149% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 135
119% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
0GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 365
Mixed 188
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 15.4
72% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 10.1
34% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 32 24 29 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 24
9% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 122 120 126 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
372GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 133 132 134 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 148
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 138
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 23.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback