Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '20 at 14:36
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 71.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 303 92% 175 Pts	4-Core 565 8-Core 958 92% 761 Pts	64-Core 1,429 88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57% Above average	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 63 Parallax 64.1 60% 66.8 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 66.6 52% 63.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 43GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 144 143 143 143 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 404 Write 397 Mixed 359 SusWrite 176 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 48.5 169% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 134 118% 178 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 108%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 15GB free Firmware: UG2204RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 445 Write 362 Mixed 196 74% 335 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 15.6 72% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 12.4 34% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 499GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 102 115 112 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 121 Write 165 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 104 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1TB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 121 126 123 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 125 Mixed 66 SusWrite 124 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 361GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 97 99 111 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 151 Write 118 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 104 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 87,241 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67% Good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 26.2 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 24.2 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,658x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,274x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,079x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16