Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 22:20
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 428
56% 423 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 77
Parallax 65.6
62% 72.7 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 72.5
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$75
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 500
Write 346
Mixed 350
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 16.9
90% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 16.3
36% 70 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72%
Great: 118%
Samsung HD153WI 1.5TB
98GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 69.5
Write 95.2
Mixed 96.5
66% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
26GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 48.4
Write 51.4
Mixed 51.2
38% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.35
76% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB
695GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 85.4
Mixed 84.3
111% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
19GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 18.2
Mixed 22.8
29% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.61
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 1.28
144% 2.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback