Asrock P75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 09:39
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 287 291 286 288 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 475
Write 294
Mixed 259
SusWrite 288
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 31.2
106% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 229
194% 283 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 99P5471-002.A01LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock P75 Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $574
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback