HP Compaq 8000 Elite Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory1.3 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 06:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 87.6
46% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 86
8-Core 87.8
12% 86.9 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3646) 765MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.53
0% 0.55 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 92 98 98 101 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 107
Write 97
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 93.9
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 8.2 7.5 7.9 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 7.9
9% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 38GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback