Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 02:53
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 470
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 62.3
59% 68.8 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 72.8
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 156 151 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 478
Mixed 376
SusWrite 175
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 51.5
177% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 353
268% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
53GB free
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 126 128 121 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 485
Write 113
Mixed 127
SusWrite 127
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 19.4
109% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 49.4
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 177 200 197 192 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 74.7
Write 136
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 188
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 66 116 1.9 74 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 30.1
Write 30.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 62.4
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
135% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback