Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 22:18
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 158 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 299 31% 248 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Lighting 64.6 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 61.2 53% 64.5 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 55.6 51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 72 67 78 98 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.5% Poor	Read 206 Write 108 Mixed 96.2 SusWrite 82.9 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 13.7 49% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 28 DQ Mixed 18.8 15% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$112 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 726GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 120 116 114 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 119 Write 127 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 113 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - $170

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	43x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 10,150 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16