Hasee PA70ES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Hasee PA70ES (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook PA70ES
Memory	16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180515
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 20:07
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 562 60% 478 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 67C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 113 Parallax 6.59 5% 42.2 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 5.77 Splatting 13.3 8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,813 Write 1,018 Mixed 737 261% 1,189 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 98.7 4K Mixed 65.6 216% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,056 DQ Write 666 DQ Mixed 782 604% 835 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 125GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 67 65 68 67 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 116 Write 92 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 68.5 63% 85 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 178% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 72%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 8,475 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 130GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 86 86 85 89 91 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 79 Write 132 Mixed 104 SusWrite 85 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.8 185% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 41GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 92 95 94 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 147 Write 143 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 94 143% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 230% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MGA16TF2G64HZ-2G6H1 2x16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 23.8 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 27 76% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PA70ES Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Hasee PA70ES

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	1x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 16GBUnknownBench 79%, 6 samples	1x
MGA16TF2G64HZ-2G6H1 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16