Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 329
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 68
Parallax 82.9
54% 72.2 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 60
Splatting 54.7
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 139 154 157 159 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 469
Write 431
Mixed 353
SusWrite 163
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 34.8
125% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 184
181% 288 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
372GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 123 124 108 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 186
Write 161
Mixed 107
SusWrite 120
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 1315 BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback